Agriculture: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Reorgainize Problem Areas and add citation) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Agriculture.png|thumb|A schematic of the ways that machine learning can support carbon negative agriculture, forestry, and land use.]] |
[[File:Agriculture.png|thumb|A schematic of the ways that machine learning can support carbon negative agriculture, forestry, and land use.]] |
||
Agriculture is responsible for about 14% of GHG emissions <ref>{{Cite book|last=Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change|url=http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781107415416|title=Climate Change 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change|date=2014|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-107-41541-6|location=Cambridge|doi=10.1017/cbo9781107415416}}</ref>. This might come as a surprise, since plants take up CO<sub>2</sub> from the air. However, modern industrial agriculture involves more than just growing plants. First, the land is stripped of trees, releasing carbon sequestered there. Second, the process of tilling exposes topsoil to the air, thereby releasing carbon that had been bound in soil aggregates and disrupting organisms in the soil that contribute to sequestration. Finally, because such farming practices strip soil of nutrients, nitrogen-based fertilizers must be added back to the system. Synthesizing these fertilizers consumes massive amounts of energy, about 2% of global energy consumption |
Agriculture is responsible for about 14% of GHG emissions <ref>{{Cite book|last=Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change|url=http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781107415416|title=Climate Change 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change|date=2014|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-107-41541-6|location=Cambridge|doi=10.1017/cbo9781107415416}}</ref>. This might come as a surprise, since plants take up CO<sub>2</sub> from the air. However, modern industrial agriculture involves more than just growing plants. First, the land is stripped of trees, releasing carbon sequestered there. Second, the process of tilling exposes topsoil to the air, thereby releasing carbon that had been bound in soil aggregates and disrupting organisms in the soil that contribute to sequestration. Finally, because such farming practices strip soil of nutrients, nitrogen-based fertilizers must be added back to the system. Synthesizing these fertilizers consumes massive amounts of energy, about 2% of global energy consumption <ref>{{Cite journal|last=Montoya|first=Joseph H.|last2=Tsai|first2=Charlie|last3=Vojvodic|first3=Aleksandra|last4=Nørskov|first4=Jens K.|date=2015-06-10|title=The Challenge of Electrochemical Ammonia Synthesis: A New Perspective on the Role of Nitrogen Scaling Relations|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201500322|journal=ChemSusChem|volume=8|issue=13|pages=2180–2186|doi=10.1002/cssc.201500322|issn=1864-5631}}</ref>. Moreover, while some of this nitrogen is absorbed by plants or retained in the soil, some is converted to nitrous oxide, a greenhouse gas that is about 300 times more potent than CO<sub>2</sub>. |
||
Such industrial agriculture approaches are ultimately based on making farmland more uniform and predictable. This allows it to be managed at scale using basic automation tools like tractors, but can be both more destructive and less productive than approaches that work with the natural heterogeneity of land and crops. Increasingly, there is demand for sophisticated tools which would allow farmers to work at scale, but adapt to what the land needs. This approach is often known as “precision agriculture.” |
Such industrial agriculture approaches are ultimately based on making farmland more uniform and predictable. This allows it to be managed at scale using basic automation tools like tractors, but can be both more destructive and less productive than approaches that work with the natural heterogeneity of land and crops. Increasingly, there is demand for sophisticated tools which would allow farmers to work at scale, but adapt to what the land needs. This approach is often known as “precision agriculture.” |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* Soil sensing |
* Soil sensing |
||
* Farming assistant |
* Farming assistant |
||
*Field robotics for autonomous agriculture |
|||
=== Robotic agriculture === |
|||
Development of autonomous robots for performing specific tasks on crops. |
|||
=== Monitoring agriculture === |
=== Monitoring agriculture === |
||
Revision as of 18:14, 31 August 2020
Agriculture is responsible for about 14% of GHG emissions [1]. This might come as a surprise, since plants take up CO2 from the air. However, modern industrial agriculture involves more than just growing plants. First, the land is stripped of trees, releasing carbon sequestered there. Second, the process of tilling exposes topsoil to the air, thereby releasing carbon that had been bound in soil aggregates and disrupting organisms in the soil that contribute to sequestration. Finally, because such farming practices strip soil of nutrients, nitrogen-based fertilizers must be added back to the system. Synthesizing these fertilizers consumes massive amounts of energy, about 2% of global energy consumption [2]. Moreover, while some of this nitrogen is absorbed by plants or retained in the soil, some is converted to nitrous oxide, a greenhouse gas that is about 300 times more potent than CO2.
Such industrial agriculture approaches are ultimately based on making farmland more uniform and predictable. This allows it to be managed at scale using basic automation tools like tractors, but can be both more destructive and less productive than approaches that work with the natural heterogeneity of land and crops. Increasingly, there is demand for sophisticated tools which would allow farmers to work at scale, but adapt to what the land needs. This approach is often known as “precision agriculture.”
Problem Areas
Precision agriculture
Can increase the yield, reduce the need for tillage and fertilizers.
- Weed and pest detection
- Soil sensing
- Farming assistant
- Field robotics for autonomous agriculture
Monitoring agriculture
- Estimating carbon in soil and soil health
- Estimating emissions of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O)
- Segmentation and classification of crops
- Quantifying cattles and other farm animals
Background Readings
- Characterizing agricultural drought in the Karamoja subregion of Uganda with meteorological and satellite-based indices
- Remote Sensing Techniques for Soil Organic Carbon Estimation: A Review
Online Courses and Course Materials
Community
Journals
Workshops
- Computer Vision for Agriculture, ICLR 2020
Groups and Labs
Library and Tools
Some packages for working with remote sensing data are,
- eo-learn: A python package maintained by the European Space Agency, giving easy access to imagery from Sentinel satellites, as well as utilities for data processing
Data
Remote sensing
Remote Sensing Datasets offers great opportunity to monitor agriculture and can be georeferenced to match ground measurements. In particular, Google earth engine offers a convenient interface over freely available satellite imagery such as Landsat and Sentinel.
Remote Crop Identification
Kaggle datasets
- Plant Seedlings Dataset
- Agriculture crop images
- Global Food & Agriculture Statistics
- Weed Detection in Soybean Crops
- crop and weed detection data with bounding boxes
- DeepWeedsX
- California Crop Mapping - 2014
References
- ↑ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014). Climate Change 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415416. ISBN 978-1-107-41541-6.
- ↑ Montoya, Joseph H.; Tsai, Charlie; Vojvodic, Aleksandra; Nørskov, Jens K. (2015-06-10). "The Challenge of Electrochemical Ammonia Synthesis: A New Perspective on the Role of Nitrogen Scaling Relations". ChemSusChem. 8 (13): 2180–2186. doi:10.1002/cssc.201500322. ISSN 1864-5631.